3 thoughts on “Long read: modelling identity in Enterprise Architecture / ArchiMate

  1. Jan, great effort. I am not an expert in this field, so I may have some stupid questions for you, I just like to understand your effort. My question are: why don’t you refer you RBAC and ABAC? Why should IDENTITY literally be modelled? Why don’t your refer to this paper? : https://ai2-s2-public.s3.amazonaws.com/figures/2017-08-08/9a5643d19a14b3e32ae2bdeaa7d859736b3454c5/3-Figure2-1.png https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Modeling-Access-Control-Transactions-in-Enterprise-Gaaloul-Guerreiro/9a5643d19a14b3e32ae2bdeaa7d859736b3454c5
    In this presentation also RBAC is mentioned as IAM paradigm: https://www.slideshare.net/AlainHuet2/infosafe-ah-iam-2013-26270185

    When I write scientific articles, I always start with: scholar.google.com
    https://scholar.google.nl/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=archimate+rbac&btnG=

    1. Mark, questions are never stupid. (Not asking questions may be.) I don’t refer to RBAC/ABAC because that’s access management, and the conclusion states I’ll address that in another paper (will be another long read). The Gaaloul/Guerreiro/Proper paper is already in my library, but it’s also access management – also it doesn’t cover identity, it directly ties the permissions to “users”. This overlooks the identity context. Thanks for the AlainHuet reference; I’ll investigate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top